Does the famous trademark Etro always win in court?

Does the famous trademark Etro always win in court?

Is a brand's reputation enough to block every similar name worldwide? The dispute between the Etro fashion house and a Kazakh restaurant shows that trademark protection has its territorial and sectoral limits.

Table of contents:

The conflict between luxury fashion and local cuisine

The Italian fashion house Etro, known worldwide for its exclusive materials and distinctive paisley pattern, has faced an unexpected challenge in the Kazakh market. Lawyers representing the brand attempted to invalidate the registration of the trademark “ETRO,” which was registered by a local entrepreneur running a restaurant. The main argument of the Italian side was that their trademark enjoys the status of a well-known brand. In intellectual property law, this means that such a brand should benefit from protection that extends beyond the specific goods and services for which it was registered.

Why did the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan reject Etro’s claims?

Despite the brand’s international reputation, the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan upheld the decisions of the lower courts and the Intellectual Property Office (Qazpatent). The judges ruled that at the time the local restaurant applied to register its trademark, the Etro fashion house did not provide sufficient evidence that its name was widely known specifically in Kazakhstan. This is a classic example of the conflict between the principle of reputation and the principle of territoriality. The court emphasized that awareness of the brand among a narrow group of fashion experts or people traveling to Milan is not the same as widespread recognition among average consumers in Astana or Almaty.

Evidence of reputation vs. limits of protection

Etro’s lawyers argued that the similarity in names would lead to confusion among customers, who might think the restaurant is part of the luxury brand from Italy. However, the lack of concrete sales data and advertising expenses incurred directly in Kazakhstan before the disputed registration proved decisive. This situation demonstrates that even the most “iconic” brands must take care to formally protect their rights in each market separately, rather than relying on their global fame to automatically “take care of things” in the local patent office.

The importance of protecting intellectual property in a company

This case is an important lesson for all business owners: reputation must be backed up by solid facts and market presence. If you are planning international expansion, don’t wait for someone else to register your name in the local registry. It is worth conducting an intellectual property audit and checking whether your brand is safe in the markets you are interested in.

Table of contents:

“The Etro fashion house did not provide sufficient evidence that its name was widely known specifically in Kazakhstan.”

Start character scan now

Fill out the form and we will get back to you within the next … with a preliminary quote.

    Jaki znak mamy zbadać?


    Wybierz „znak słowny”, jeżeli chcesz zbadać oznaczenie słowne, i wpisz je w okienku poniżej. Możesz podać tylko jedno oznaczenie.
    Wybierz „znak graficzny lub słowno-graficzny”, jeżeli Twój znak ma określoną postać graficzną. W okienku poniżej wpisz elementy słowne, jeżeli takie pojawiają się na grafice, i dodaj plik zawierający grafikę znaku. Możesz przesłać tylko jeden plik o maksymalnym rozmiarze 1mb.

    Podaj szczegółowo, dla jakich towarów lub usług będzie używany Twój znak. W okienku poniżej wyszukaj odpowiedni termin, a następnie kliknij na niego, by dodać towar lub usługę do listy. Możesz dodać jednocześnie wiele towarów lub usług. Przed przejściem do następnego kroku upewnij się, że na liście znajdują się wszystkie towary lub usługi – później nie będzie można jej zmodyfikować!

    jakich produktów lub usług dotyczy rejestracja