+48 22 355 32 21

®
A German court gives Nike the green light to use the three-stripe motif

A German court gives Nike the green light to use the three-stripe motif

Adidas is undoubtedly an icon in the world of sportswear, and it is primarily distinguished by its globally recognized three stripes, which adorn the brand's products. In recent years, a dispute regarding this distinctive mark has n ongoing between Adidas and another American sportswear giant, Nike. As it turns out, the past few months have brought an end to the dispute, as a German court issued a groundbreaking decision, allowing Nike to use the three-stripe motif in some of its designs. This is a ruling that changes the rules of the game following a lawsuit that Adidas filed in 2022, accusing Nike of trademark infringement.

Table of contents:

Dispute history

The dispute between Adidas and Nike began in 2022, when Adidas accused Nike of unlawfully using its distinctive trademark – three parallel stripes – in its clothing collections. As a result, the regional court in Düsseldorf initially prohibited Nike from using the stripe motif (two or three stripes) in five of its trouser models.

Breakthrough in the case

Interestingly, after Nike appealed the ruling, the latest court decision reversed the previous verdict, making it a landmark decision. During one of the appellate hearings, the court ruled that the American company could use the three-stripe motif, but only in a few specific designs. More precisely, this applies to four models of trousers that were the subject of the dispute. At the same time, the ban on using the stripes in one of the remaining models was upheld. This outcome indicates a significant victory for Nike in the legal dispute with Adidas, as the appeal proved successful in 80% of the cases.

Reactions and hopes for other companies

This ruling could have a significant impact on other companies that have previously lost legal battles with Adidas. The German corporation has repeatedly accused various brands of misleading consumers with products that are too similar to Adidas’s trademark (as in the recent case with Kubota). Many of these companies have agreed to settlements, abandoning the stripe motif or replacing three stripes with a different number – all in order to avoid similarity. However, the latest ruling may encourage other brands to fight more assertively for their rights.

Nike Position

Throughout the process, Nike argued that the protection of Adidas’s famous trademark was too restrictive. They believed that parallel stripes do not necessarily have to be unequivocally associated with the Adidas brand, and therefore, the use of such a motif by third parties should not be prohibited.

The German court’s decision, although partially favorable to Nike, sets an important precedent and offers hope for a more balanced approach to trademark protection in the future.

Table of contents:

“The protection of Adidas’s famous trademark is too restrictive.”

Start character scan now

Fill out the form and we will get back to you within the next … with a preliminary quote.

    Jaki znak mamy zbadać?


    Wybierz „znak słowny”, jeżeli chcesz zbadać oznaczenie słowne, i wpisz je w okienku poniżej. Możesz podać tylko jedno oznaczenie.
    Wybierz „znak graficzny lub słowno-graficzny”, jeżeli Twój znak ma określoną postać graficzną. W okienku poniżej wpisz elementy słowne, jeżeli takie pojawiają się na grafice, i dodaj plik zawierający grafikę znaku. Możesz przesłać tylko jeden plik o maksymalnym rozmiarze 1mb.

    Podaj szczegółowo, dla jakich towarów lub usług będzie używany Twój znak. W okienku poniżej wyszukaj odpowiedni termin, a następnie kliknij na niego, by dodać towar lub usługę do listy. Możesz dodać jednocześnie wiele towarów lub usług. Przed przejściem do następnego kroku upewnij się, że na liście znajdują się wszystkie towary lub usługi – później nie będzie można jej zmodyfikować!

    jakich produktów lub usług dotyczy rejestracja