
It is worth noting that in the past, this provision, to the extent that it concerned the possibility of claiming three times the appropriate remuneration that would be due at the time of its claim for the authorized granting of permission to use a given work, was deemed unconstitutional.
This time, the subject of the legal question was the same provision, but to the extent that it allows for the claim of double remuneration. Interestingly, almost the entire community of creators and artists was awaiting the final decision in this matter, which, in the event of a positive outcome, would have additional advantages in the fight against entities infringing copyright.
In its ruling of November 5, 2019 (case file number P 14/19), the Constitutional Tribunal answered the question posed by the Supreme Court in the affirmative, stating that the aforementioned provision is consistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
The justification stated that the claim for double the compensation is not related to or dependent on the degree of fault of the defendant, i.e., the party infringing copyright, which should be viewed differently from civil penalties. Consequently, double the compensation cannot be considered an amount unrelated to the actual value of the damage suffered by the rights holder. As a result, the Court found that the provision in question effectively mitigates the differences between the parties in a dispute arising from the infringement of copyright by its unlawful use. Thus, the rights holder is in a somewhat weaker position due to the more difficult task of detecting copyright infringements and proving the specific amount of damage. Therefore, granting the rights holder the possibility of claiming double the compensation that would be due at the time of its claim for granting permission to use the work should be considered an effective regulation, taking into account the constitutional standards of control.
Fill out the form and we will get back to you within the next … with a preliminary quote.